AI writes the boilerplate. PulsePR audits the architecture. Staff-level engineers from top-tier companies review every tagged PR — directly inside GitHub, with guaranteed turnaround times.
Refactored the payment processor to use async queue. Added retry logic. LGTM cc @pulsepr
⚠️ 3 architectural concerns before this merges to production:
// The retry backoff does not account for idempotency keys.
await queue.push(payload, { retries: 3 })
// ↑ If the downstream Stripe call succeeds but ACK fails,
// this WILL double-charge on retry. You need to persist
// the idempotency key *before* enqueue, not after.Also flagged: missing circuit-breaker on the Redis dependency, and the DLQ handler has a subtle race with the main consumer under high concurrency. Full writeup below.
@pulsepr in any PR.Install the PulsePR GitHub App and select which repositories you want covered. When prompted, grant read access to pull requests — that's all we need. No cloning, no broad org permissions.
Drop @pulsepr anywhere in a PR comment or description. Add a priority flag like @pulsepr urgent to trigger the 4-hour SLA.
A vetted engineer from our network — matched to your stack — reviews the diff for architectural soundness, security, and production risk. For private repositories, we'll send you their GitHub username so you can grant them read access before the review begins.
The review is posted directly as GitHub comments — inline findings, severity labels, and a written summary. No new tools, no separate inbox. Your team discusses and resolves it where the code already lives.
GitHub Copilot and Cursor are excellent at generating syntactically correct code. They are not designed to reason about distributed systems failure modes, idempotency invariants, or your specific database schema. PulsePR is the layer that catches what AI can't see.
No Jira tickets. No context switches. The entire review lifecycle — request, review, comments, approval — lives in the PR thread where developers already work.
Raw PR metrics become actionable technical debt dashboards. Show your CTO regression rates, velocity trends, and code health scores — not just green CI checks.
Standard reviews in 24 hours. Priority tags in 4 hours. Enterprise clients get dedicated reviewer slots. No more PRs languishing unreviewed over a long weekend.
Every retainer starts with a one-time deep-dive into your codebase conventions. Reviewers understand your patterns from day one — not after the third review.
Every reviewer in our network is vetted through a rigorous technical assessment. Profiles are anonymized by default to protect reviewer privacy — your signed NDA covers the full engagement.
Are you a Staff+ engineer from a top-tier company?
Apply to the network →Our GitHub App requests read access to only the diff of tagged PRs. We never clone your repository, access unrelated branches, or store your source code.
Every review engagement is covered by a bilateral NDA. For Enterprise clients, we support your standard vendor NDA with legal review within 48 hours.
We never store your source code, so there's no sensitive data to protect at rest. The security model is data minimization first — we designed out the compliance surface area rather than papering over it.
Reviewers access only the specific diff they are assigned. No reviewer can browse other PRs, historical diffs, or metadata from your organization.
All plans include: GitHub-native workflow, NDA coverage, Staff-level reviewers, and access to the executive dashboard.
For teams with sporadic high-stakes PRs. No commitment, full quality.
For engineering teams shipping continuously. Predictable cost, unlimited velocity.
For organizations with compliance requirements, multiple teams, and executive accountability.
* Architecture Context Audit (Team): a one-time deep-dive session where your dedicated reviewer studies your codebase conventions, existing patterns, and known technical debt — so they hit the ground running. No ramp-up period. Meaningful feedback from PR #1. Full Systems Audit (Enterprise): a broader engagement covering multiple services, cross-team dependencies, and architecture risk across your entire stack. Scope and pricing agreed upfront.
Every reviewer completes a multi-stage assessment: a blind code review of a complex PR with known issues, a systems design session, and reference checks with former managers. We set a high bar by design — the goal is a small, trusted network, not a large one.
The Architecture Context Audit maps your stack upfront. We maintain detailed profiles for each reviewer and match by primary stack, domain (fintech, infra, etc.), and your company stage. You can request a re-match at any time.
Our SLA includes a quality guarantee: if a reviewed PR causes a production incident within 30 days and our review didn't flag the root cause, that review is free and you receive a root cause postmortem from our team.
PulsePR is additive, not a replacement. Most teams use it for high-risk PRs: core infra changes, payment flows, auth systems, and migrations. Your internal reviewers stay focused on business logic and team context.
Yes. Public repositories get a discounted rate. Contact us for open source pricing.
GitHub Enterprise Cloud is fully supported today. GHES support is on the Q3 roadmap. GitLab integration is planned for Q4.
Once a reviewer is assigned, we'll send you their GitHub username. Add them as a collaborator with read access on the relevant repo — they only need to see the PR diff, nothing else. You can remove them as soon as the review is delivered. Public repos require no action at all.
We'll tell you — and ask you to untag us. We only assign reviews where we have deep, verified expertise in the specific stack and domain. If we can't match you with someone who genuinely knows your environment, we'd rather pass than give you a mediocre review. No vague feedback, no guesswork.
Join the waitlist. Founding teams get locked-in pricing, white-glove onboarding, and direct access to the PulsePR team during the beta.
No credit card required. We'll reach out within 48 hours.